Election Day, Nov 3 6 daysSenate D 85%House D 97%Governors D 86%Forecast updated Oct 28
2026 forecast ยท Texas 22nd

Trever Nehls is very likely to win Texas's 22nd District.

Marquette Greene-Scott vs Trever Nehls, an open seat. The model has Nehls ahead by 10.3 points, winning 93 percent of 2,000 simulated elections.

Likely RModel R +10.3Updated October 28, 2026
Marquette Greene-Scott
Democrat
44.9%
120,105 projected votes
Trever Nehls
Republican
55.1%
147,619 projected votes
93%Nehls
7%Greene-Scott
Nehls very likelyEach square is one simulated election night, Nehls wins about 93 of 100
RatingLikely R93% chance for Nehls
Model marginR +10.3No polls in the race
80 percent rangeR +1.4 to R +18.82,000 simulations
Projected votes267,724Nehls 55.1%

The district map

Every district in the state, shaded by its rating

Texas districts

38 districts
Safe DLikely DLean DToss upLean RLikely RSafe R

Vote share

Each candidate's projected share and the range of 80 percent of simulations

Marquette Greene-ScottDemocrat ยท 7% to win
44.9%
Trever NehlsRepublican ยท 93% to win
55.1%

Scale runs from 25 to 75 percent. The dot is the forecast, the band is the 80 percent range and the brighter tick marks 50 percent.

Projected district vote

267,724 votes
CandidateVotesShare
Trever Nehls R147,61955.1%
Marquette Greene-Scott D120,10544.9%
Total267,724100%

Each candidate's expected vote in the On Point simulation, at the forecast's projected turnout.

The trend

Each side's chance of winning over the forecast's recent updates

0%25%50%75%100%7% Greene-Scott93% Nehls19 updates agoToday

Polling

Every poll in the average, and how the model reads it

The Texas governor polling average
38%40%42%44%46%48%50%52%54%56%MayJunJulAugSepOct46.7Hinojosa50.0Abbott
The line is the On Point average: a robust LOWESS fit through the polls, weighted by recency, sample, voter screen and pollster grade, refit three times so outliers count for lessDot size is each poll's weight todayHollow dot: a lean firm's poll as published; the filled dot is where the average counts it, after its measured lean is taken offHover or use the arrow keys to read any day
What moves the average today
Emerson CollegeOct 19 ยท 1,000 LV ยท Gold15%Abbott +4.0
Fox News/Beacon Research and Shaw & CompanyOct 19 ยท 1,398 LV ยท A++15%Abbott +5.0
On Point PollingOct 18 ยท 385 LV ยท Gold15%Abbott +2.0
Fox News/Beacon Research and Shaw & CompanySep 28 ยท 881 LV ยท A++9.9%Abbott +5.0
Texas Public Opinion ResearchOct 18 ยท 969 LV ยท NR ยท D lean, counted Abbott +3.1 in the average7.0%Abbott +3.0
University of Houston Hobby SchoolOct 14 ยท 2,000 LV ยท NR6.4%Abbott +3.0
Every other poll together: 31%

This is the same On Point polling average as the full average page. The forecast reads the polls through its own Election Day projection, shown as the On Point average in the table below, and blends it with partisan lean and fundamentals.

Polls of the race

Full average
PollsterSampleAgeMargin
On Point averageWeighted averageNo polls

Each margin is the poll as the pollster published it. The forecast counts every poll after its house effect and the undecided split, which is what the trail above shows; hover a margin for the counted value. Lean R and Lean D mark partisan leaning firms.

Model margin
Nehls +10.3
Chance of winning
Marquette Greene-Scott7%
Trever Nehls93%
Simulated vote
Marquette Greene-Scott44.9%
Trever Nehls55.1%
How the model gets there
Partisan leanD +22.0
FundamentalsR +10.0
With pollsR +10.3

How we got here

From the state's partisan lean to the forecast, one stage at a time

D +26R +26Partisan leanthe state's baselineD +22.0Fundamentalsapproval, economy, candidatesR +10.0With pollsno pollsR +10.3
On Point on YouTubeThe Texas House race, explained on YouTubeForecast breakdowns, the polls and election night coverage on the On Point channel.Subscribe
Methodology
Every county is rebuilt by simulating voters going to the polls, 2,000 times, from On Point Polling survey data, past results, and the polling average. How the model works.